New Standard in Organic Solar Cell Efficiency – 9.8%!

Semitransparent Solar Cell

Semitransparent solar cell. (Heliatek GmbH)

Organic solar cells, which are carbon-based materials that can convert sunlight into electricity, offer many mechanical and environmental advantages over conventional silicon technology. The competition to deliver the most efficient material is intense, with several companies vying for the current efficiency crown. Heliatek GmbH, a German organic solar cell company, announced that it had set a new world record with 9.8% efficient organic solar cells as certified by the Fraunhofer Institute. Heliatek’s efficiency bests the previous record of 8.3%, which was also held by Heliatek. The results are exciting as it finally approaches the 10% efficiency level that is often thought to be the threshold for organic solar cells to reach economic viability.

Organic solar cells can be broadly divided into two competing camps: polymer-based and oligomer-based. The difference between the two is size– a polymer is a giant chain of tens of thousands of individual molecular building blocks called monomers, while an oligomer is typically no more than ten such blocks. Another way to to think of this is that polymers are long strands, like spaghetti, while oligomers are small pieces, like grains of rice. Companies like Solarmer and Konarka use the polymer approach, while Heliatek has had remarkable success with their oligomer approach.

Heliatek’s solar cells use a “tandem” approach where multiple layers absorb different wavelengths of light. Sunlight is composed of a broad range of colors, each with a different energy. You observe this all the time in rainbows or using a prism to diffract light. An ideal solar cell would absorb all wavelengths of sunlight while also providing an efficient means to transform that absorbed light into electrical current. No one material exists that does both jobs well. The tandem approach circumvents this by using different materials, each absorbing a range of sunlight’s colors. The separate layers effectively form distinct solar cells that are then connected together.

The exact molecules used are proprietary. However, scientists from Heliatek have published some of their results in academic literature. It appears that they use a sexithiophene-based molecule (consists of six “thiophene” units, which are a four carbons and a sulfur connected in a pentagon) to absorb green light. It is possible they use a standard fullerene acceptor for the blue light. Fullerenes are spherical all-carbon molecules that resemble a soccer ball.  The third component that absorbs the red, arguably the most important given how much red and infrared light are not captured by most organic solar cells, is hard to determine. It appears to be a fluorinated zinc phthalocyanine molecule, which is a a sort of ring-shaped molecule containing a zinc in the center. These are used in published papers but it is not clear that the final device actually consists of these materials at all.

The certified device was a 1.1 cm^2 and was on a glass subtrate rather than a flexible, large-area material. Reportedly, Heliatek will significantly ramp up production next year. It will be interesting to see when the 10% mark is passed, as seems inevitable at this point. More importantly, I am curious if polymeric competitors will ever catch up as the best polymer solar cell efficiences are currently in the lower ~8% range.

Full press release from Heliatek

Here are some related papers from the Heliatek researchers regarding the materials discussed above:

Meiss, et al. Applied Physics Letters 99, 043301 (2011). DOI: 10.1063/1.3610551 (regarding Heliatek’s tandem cells in general)

Meiss, et al. Advanced Functional Materials. In press, as of this writing. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201101799 (zinc phthalocynanine molecule that absorbs red light)

Levichkova, et al. Organic Electronics 12, 2243 (2011). DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2011.09.022 (Dicyanovinyl sexithiophene molecule that absorbs green light)


A Little Metal Goes a Long Way to Reducing Plastic Solar Cell Costs

Polymer solar cells, devices that convert sunlight into electricity using only plastic materials, require a transparent conducting electrode that can both let light through and transfer charge out of the device. Most conventional devices use indium tin oxide (ITO), which has the benefits of reasonable conductivity and high transparency. However, polymer solar cells are often touted for being cheap and mechanically flexible, but ITO is expensive and brittle. One alternative is to use a highly-conducting polymer called PEDOT:PSS, but that also faces its share of problems. Its conductivity drops off dramatically as device sizes go up, significantly reducing solar cell efficiency.

Writing in Advanced Energy Materials, Galagan et al. demonstrate a metal grid approach that replaces expensive ITO with much cheaper inkjet-printed silver or lithographic molybdenum-aluminum-molybdenum lines. The PEDOT:PSS is deposited on top of the grid to form a transparent conducting electrode. The advantage of the grid is to allow light through yet provide charge collection pathways near the PEDOT even at large substrate sizes. While such metal grids have been reported by other groups, here the authors go further in exploring the parameter space and show that they can model the devices.

The group uses a range of pitch sizes to determine the optimal spacing, in this case about 2.5 mm between metal lines. There is a significant shadow effect, where there is dead, nonconductive space under the metal, and this increases dramatically at smaller pitch sizes. Additionally, the films reported tend to degrade over time. However, replacing ITO entirely with a metal grid resulted in efficiency of ~2.4%, higher than expected for a non-ITO electrode, and the authors think that process optimization would boost that efficiency level even higher.

Galagan, et al. Advanced Energy Materials. DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201100552

 


The PhD Comics Movie

The above picture is currently on the outside of my office door at UW. Jorge Cham had just started his tours of university campuses giving his talk about the power of procrastination. The talk itself was, as expected, hilarious if you were a graduate student in natural sciences. And, of course, there was free food so it drew a crowd.

During the subsequent book signing, I asked Cham a question illustrated in the second panel. The conversation went something like this:

Me: “So…how long did you PhD take?”

Cham: (jokingly) “That’s a very personal question, and I would rather not answer.”

Me: (smiling like an idiot, laughing a little)

Cham: “It took five-and-a-half years, but don’t tell anyone else.”

Me: “Oh, I see, you need to maintain your street cred!”

Cham: “Ha, ‘street cred’! Who do I make this out to?”

That was when he signed both my volumes. I still have one on my shelf now, the other is living somewhere in Houston (I think). During grad school, this comic strip was a surprising breath of fresh air into what is otherwise a dismal time in most students’ lives. You work 60 hours a week or more, often in a lab with no windows, and in my case that lab was in this dehumanizing yellow light that was meant to reduce ultraviolet light exposure for sensitive chemicals in the lab.

When the trailer for the PhD Comics movie first came out, I was unsure what to make out of it. The acting was rough and amateur, and it felt like the movie was going to be a series of punchlines rather than a coherent story. I went to the screening on Thursday curious of the result.

The movie is framed as a thesis, complete with chapter titles. The story centers on the two main students from the comics, the unnamed student in Professor Smith’s lab and Cecilia. Their stories are told in alternating scenes until they, predictably but nonetheless appropriately, intersect late in the film. The unnamed student is struggling to produce critical results for a symposium while managing life in the lab, while Cecilia is facing mounting difficulties getting the students in her TA session to react positively to her efforts. They both feel jaded, for different reasons.

Other characters from the comics like Tajel and Mike Slackenerny play prominent roles, as does Prof. Smith. They serve as sounding boards for the unnamed student’s and Cecilia’s misery, respectively, with each offering similar advice. In fact, one scene shows these two in split screen. Occassional comic episodes, such as a squash game with Prof. Smith or a particularly funny ballroom dance scene with Cecilia, are interspersed.

Artwork accentuates scenes in the film, including an attractive opening sequence. In fact, the production quality was surprisingly high, and the music fit the scenes with an upbeat, rock-inspired score not entirely dissimilar to a coming-of-age film from the late 90s.

Criticizing the movie itself would be easy– there are entire scenes lifted or adapted from the comics making the punchlines occasionally predictable, it was somewhat episodic in nature, the editing was overzealous in places with half-second angle switches for no reason. The movie is also quite short, barely clocking in at over an hour, short even compared to an animated movie.

But that is all beside the point, as this was a side project to give grad students a view of themselves on screen. In fact, I didn’t realize until after I watched the movie that the actors were rough amateurs in the trailer because they were all graduate students at CalTech and therefore WERE amateurs. This movie was a side effort to their busy research lives. And on the whole, the film caused the audience I was in to burst out laughing multiple times, and a little laughter goes a long way to making grad school tolerable.

My only primary criticism is giving the “unnamed grad student” in the movie a name. Aside from the fact that the choice of name was mundane, it takes away from one of the most attractive elements of the comics. This bespectacled, gawky yet nondescript student really stands in for anyone. But I shouldn’t complain– the comics already include me.

And yet, no one at the screening asked for my autograph.

 

 


Nanocars Go Electric

Since Richard Feynman’s famous “There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom” lecture, scientists have tried to implement his idea of a device the size of a single molecule. The ultimate goal is a machine at the nanoscale– billionths of a meter– that can be controlled. In an impressive paper reported today in Nature, Ben Feringa’s group in the Netherlands demonstrate a vehicle that is a single molecule, in this case a nanocar, that they can move using only electrical pulses.

The electrical control is the critical result because nanocars themselves are not new. Previous research on nanocars has primarily focused on non-electrical driving. For example, some groups heat up the substrate to provide their nanocars with the thermal energy to move, though this is not a highly controllable process as it drives all nanocars on the hot surface rather than a specific car . Other groups have used a metal tip to pull a nanocar, but this is more like towing than actually driving. With the electrical control, the authors now can start the car when they want and see it drive across the road, in this case a clean piece of copper.

The nanocar is a carefully-designed molecule with a rigid carbon-carbon triple bond for a central chassis, carbon ring axles, and carbon ring wheels. In actuality, the wheels are more like paddles. The paddles propel the nanocar only in a certain direction. The chemistry of these paddles is key. If the authors replace two of the paddles with their chemical mirror image, the cars will simply move around randomly.

Driving the car is a two-step process involving electrical and vibrational energy. First, the electrical pulse gives the paddle energy to initially rotate but not fully. The second process uses vibrational excitation, where part of the molecule essentially changes its conformation in order to complete the paddle’s rotation. The energy for the vibration requires a lower voltage pulse than the electrical signal. The whole system is kept at a frosty 7 K (or -447 °F). Once they apply an electrical pulse to kickstart the paddle, the vibrational energy completes the turn.

To demonstrate this motion, the scientists take images using scanning tunneling microscopy, or STM. In STM, a sharp metal tip is brought close to the surface, maybe at most a nanometer away. If a voltage is applied between the metal tip and the sample underneath, a current flows between them. The larger the voltage, the greater the current. The metal tip is scanned back and forth while electrons are flowing into the surface, and the electron flow can be used to create an image.

The electrical pulse used to drive the nanocars is also applied by the STM tip. The authors take an image at a low voltage to make sure they find a nanocar, then move the tip over the molecule and apply a higher voltage to start the car’s engine. The nanocar then moves, albeit glacially– it takes ten electrical pulses to move 6 nanometers.

In the end, the scientists proved that they can move their carefully-designed nanocars at desired times using only electrical pulses. In the future, molecular machines designed with similar principles in mind could be used to carry cargo, for example other molecules.

Kudernac, et al. Nature 479, 208 (2011). DOI: 10.1038/nature10587


A Golden Method to Improve Solar Cell Efficiency

One of the primary issues plaguing organic solar cells is inefficient light absorption. Polymer solar cells have to be thin to accommodate the relatively low charge mobility — if the films are too thick, the photogenerated charges will simply recombine before reaching the electrodes, limiting the amount of power that can be produced. On the other hand, if the films are too thin much of the incident sunlight will not get absorbed and will be reflected away.

In Applied Physics Letters, Xie and co-workers report an increase in the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of their organic solar cell devices by incorporating gold nanoparticles. The gold nanoparticles exhibit a local surface plasmon resonance that significantly enhances absorption. As a result, more sunlight is absorbed and more charge is generated, even from a thin active layer.

Additionally, Xie et al. went one step further and incorporated the gold nanoparticles in the layer between the photoactive material and the transparent conducting oxide electrode. While this layer does not absorb light, the gold nanoparticles decrease the series resistance by almost 30%. Low series resistance at the electrode is important in preventing charges from recombining instead of being extracted.

As a result of the combined effects of light absorption and low series resistance, the gold nanoparticles increase the PCE by up to 22% in their devices. Further experiments, perhaps using much cheaper silver nanoparticles or using nanoparticles in some of more cutting edge materials with higher efficiencies, may finally push plastic solar cell efficiencies into the industrially viable range.

F-X. Xie, et al. Applied Physics Letters 99, 153304 (2011). DOI: 10.1063/1.3650707


It’s Nobel Prize week!

My favorite week of the year is upon us. This week the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences will select a winner for the chemistry and physics prizes. The Nobel Prize in Physiology has already been awarded half (jointly) to Bruce A. Beutler and Jules A. Hoffmann and the other half to Ralph M. Steinman.

Sadly, Dr. Steinman passed away only a few days ago, though the Nobel Prize committee has decided to award him the prize anyway. There was some debate about whether or not Dr. Steinman’s death would make him ineligible — the avoid constantly revisiting past achievements in lieu of contemporary ones, the Nobel Prizes are not awarded posthumously. In this case, however, the committee made an exception given that they, in fact, did not know Dr. Steinman had died and therefore made the award in good faith.

The physics and chemistry prizes will be announced tomorrow and Wednesday, respectively, while the peace prize and economics award are Friday and next Monday. No date for the literature award has been set.

Predicting winners has become an annual pastime for scientists. Last year the physics award was in condensed matter (graphene) while the chemistry award was in organic synthesis. It is rare that the subject area targeted by each prize be the same in consecutive years. Thomson Reuters have their predictions, though their methodology is of course not without its critics. Indeed, they did miss with the physiology award prediction.


Flexible, High-Efficiency Solar Cells Reaching New Levels

Recently, the solar energy company Solyndra declared bankruptcy. That announcement was quickly followed by reports that the FBI had raided the Fremont, California company’s headquarters to investigate why hundreds of millions of dollars in government loans were unable to keep the company afloat, presumably suspecting fraud. And because Solyndra was heavily promoted by the White House, its bankruptcy was the subject of much debate about the government’s role in industry.

What was lost in the news shuffle was the technology behind Solyndra. Conventional solar cells, like the blue-hued ones seen everywhere from parking meters to rooftops, are made of silicon. Silicon, however, is incredibly expensive to process, a fact that has kept solar energy prices upwards of 5 to 10 times that of fossil fuels. Solyndra had a different approach. The name sounds like “cylinder” because that was their innovation: cylindrical solar panels. They used a material known as copper-indium-gallium-selenide, or CIGS, deposited on materials they could roll into tubes to make them.

CIGS is comparatively simple to produce using equipment costing only in the tens of thousands of dollars — as opposed to the literal billions spent on equipment to process silicon. It falls in the realm of “thin film” technologies, where research and development focuses on efficiency below that of silicon but at a price point that more than compensates. For example, one of the touted advantages of CIGS-based solar cells is that CIGS can be deposited on plastic films to make roll-able solar cells, which has significant advantages from a production standpoint. (Imagine a newspaper machine churning out solar panels.) While that is the ultimate goal, thus far CIGS devices produced on flexible substrates have been comparatively poor at converting the sun’s photons into electrons. In fact, that was one of the issues that did in Solyndra; their cylindrical solar panels were just not efficient enough to justify the cost.

In a new paper published in Nature Materials, Chirilă et al. report a new method for producing CIGS on a plastic substrate with record-setting efficiency for a flexible film device of ~18%. Put another way, about 1 out of every 5 photons — the individual particles of light — that reach the solar cell become electrons that are useable as a source of electricity. The problem they needed to address has to do with the temperatures used before the plastic substrate breaks down. In CIGS films deposited on metal substrates or metal-on-glass, the temperatures used to deposit the constituent materials are often in excess of 600 °C (1112 °F), far beyond the tolerance of plastics.

Why not just lower the temperature? It turns out gallium (the “G” in CIGS) does not like to combine with the other materials and forms a gallium-rich barrier at the top and bottom of the device rather than smoothly blending throughout the film. These gallium-rich regions form an energy barrier that blocks electrons from getting out of the device, which in turn limits the amount of electricity and therefore the efficiency at turning photons into electrons. The traditional way to counter this gallium barrier problem is by depositing at higher temperatures, hence the problem when it comes to flexible substrates.

The significant result from the Nature Materials paper was showing that adding the gallium in a graded amount with time can counter that barrier effect, even at lower deposition temperatures. At high temperatures, most groups use a three-stage approach where the materials are introduced at specific intervals. Instead, Chirilă and co-workers introduce the gallium throughout the process, decreasing the gallium evaporation with time to account for the barrier effect.

This work is not for a production-level system, however. Their tests were done on individually fabricated devices and not ones made on a full industrial line. Additionally, their efficiency tests did not take into account the geometry, so it’s unknown if this would have improved upon the Solyndra design considerably.

It’s unlikely that Solyndra-like technology will suddenly start beating silicon in the race to provide a green alternative to fossil fuels. In fact, Solyndra was done in by two factors that this work may not even address — the fall in polysilicon prices by nearly a factor of 10 and the heavily subsidized Chinese solar industry. On the other hand, it may simply have been that Solyndra was too far ahead of the curve. According to reports, their devices were less than 10% efficient, and if the devices were produced using the graded approach reported here, perhaps they may have been in a more competitive position.

Chirilă, et al. Nature Materials,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3122


Here comes sighence!

Well, on a whim I decided to register this domain. On another whim, I decided to install WordPress and some minimal theme. No, I have no idea what will end up here. The name is a tongue-in-cheek comment on how, as a scientist, I sometimes feel.